The show Princesses of Long Island not
only defines false representation of; Jewish, Long Island, single
women, but it sheds a bad light on what it means to be a newly thirty
year old women in modern times. If it is not bad enough to over
emphasize the stereotypes of Long Island single Jewish women; the
show also had to add desperate, dramatic, and drunk to the mixture.
Although Princesses of Long Island is not the first of its kind to
over dramatized a single stereotypical type of culture, who could
forget the classy Jersey Shore crew or every type of Real Housewife
imaginable, but the show is the first to step into the boundaries of
stereotyping a lifestyle of women as a whole.
Not only does this group of young
women greet each other with a warm “Shalom!” at every get
together, but they also go away to the Hampton's for High Holidays,
and to top all that off they take the time to go to Jewish speed
dating events. Now, the stereotyping of a “JAP”, or Jewish
American princess, has been around long before the show was every
produced. So, this is not what comes as a shock to viewers or
critics. What did get heads turning is the shows focus on how this
group of late twenty year olds were so fixated on being wed, and
having children at such a young age. Rachel Arons of The New
Yorker stated, “The social pressure that women face to get
married is the predominant, if unofficial, theme of “Princesses.”
In today's day in age when deadlines of graduating, having children,
and especially marriage are all being pushed back; to have a show
like Princesses of Long Island make such a statement that is meant to
represent women of their age group is somewhat degenerate and
appalling.
This regressive view on life, where a
man is all a women needs to get by, is extremely postmodern and
relays a bad perceptive for upcoming generations. Emma Rosenblum of
Business Week writes that, “It’s an origins story, but
instead of the character-building arc of future superheroes, we see
the early curdling of values that leads to Real Housewife-dom.”
So now we must pose the question of whether these soon to be “Real
Housewives” are a threat to the representation of thirty-something
year old women in America, and how the stereotype these “princesses”
are portraying effect women like them.
The shows that illustrate and attempt
to represent certain cultural groups, like this one, vary due to the
aspect that they are not trying to falsely personify an entire age
and gender group. Women in today's age are very career, and
independently driven. We have come a long way from the 1950's
housewife identity, maybe everyone expect for that 300 sandwiches
girl, and women being dependent on a man for financial support or
stability is a thing of the past. So, the main issue of the
representation of Long Island Princesses is how contradictory its
views on the gender role of women really is.
From the beginning to the end of the
first season of the show; every women on the show had made some
remark in regards to how quickly they need to find a mate. As Arons
quotes the show's character Chanel's parents, “ 'You’re
twenty-seven years old, you gotta get married already. You gotta go
for a doctor, or lawyer, somebody who has money, somebody who can
take care of you.’ ” So, do women of the age of twenty-seven
or above watch this, and think they fall under the same speculations.
I would hope that women watching this “reality” television
program would see through the idiocy of being married by the age of
twenty-seven and make up their own destinies. Having your number one
goal in life of being married by age 30 is something no one in
today's age should strive for.
Shows like Princesses of Long Island
and Jersey Shore are fun to watch when you are in the mood for
mindless television; but is that really all it is? The dynamics of
reality television tell us as viewers that although they are real
people we are watching; it is not always a factual scenario of life.
Even so, Long Island Princesses must have some kind of impact on
viewers to the extent that it caused some uproar in the critics eyes
and almost be taken off the air. If reality television is meant to
represent “reality” then why not really depict an accurate image
for people to feel good about. Long Island Princesses should try to
represent strong independent women who can support themselves, and if
they find a soulmate along the way, then that makes one of us. Yes,
the drama and desperation makes for good television and allows
viewers to somewhat feel better about themselves that they do not
have that much drama in their own lives, but shouldn't we want our
generations and future generation to be represented in a light that
shows we are moving forward and not backwards. Why make a television
show that we will look back on in 20 years, maybe in a television
critic class, and scrutinize its degrading attributes. Television
should be a representation of how far we as a culture have
progressed, and Princesses of Long Island is a television show that
resists us from that ideology.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.