The costuming in the popular fantasy drama Once Upon A Time is fantastic. Lavish
gowns, suits of black leather, and even fairy wings rule the day in the
Enchanted Forest. However, half of this show also takes place in Storybrooke,
Maine, a real-world counterpart that results from a curse and wipes memories of
the fantastic, dooming fairy tale characters to live out mundane lives. Do
these costumes therefore fall under the same curse of mediocrity? Not at all.
They’re just a bit more subtle in their statement-making. Through the costuming
used in the Storybrooke setting, very specific symbolism is conveyed,
especially with regards to one of the most central questions of the show: who
is Henry’s mother? In many scenes between Henry, Emma, and Regina, Henry’s two
mothers wear red and gray. In Once Upon A
Time, gray is used to symbolically mark whether Regina or Emma is accepted
as Henry’s mother at any given time.
For a bit of
context, it’s important to know that when Henry was born, Emma, the protagonist
of Once Upon A Time, gave him up for
adoption. He was adopted by Regina, with whom he lived for 10 years before
deciding to seek out his birth mother. Upon finding Emma, he convinced her to
stay in Storybrooke for a while; Emma was convinced by both a desire to get to
know her son and her (not unfounded) suspicion of Regina. Throughout the
series, parental rights are greatly challenged and negotiated, hinging on such
factors are who Henry prefers, who has legal rights to him, and public
sentiment toward the characters for their various misdeeds.
All of these factors can be difficult to navigate, which
suggests why the producers would chose to delineate motherhood through
costuming. However, it is a very subtle choice that seems likely to go
unnoticed. Perhaps I’m seeing something that isn’t there – maybe Jennifer
Morrison and Lana Parilla just look good in gray and red. From a purely content
analysis perspective, that could be so; except for the extreme prevalence of
these colors in their costumes. On a certain level, perhaps the creators assume
that these symbols will, in fact, go unnoticed. Mittell corroborates this
assumption, saying, “Every element of staging is visually
accessible to viewers, but typically we ignore how sets, costumes, and lighting
are carefully controlled aspects of a television program working to shape the
meanings and impacts of all shows.” (Mittell 177). In an age of internet
analysis and fandom blogging, where every detail is picked at and assessed, however,
this idea seems antiquated.
Gibbs and Pye’s book about style and
meaning in film agrees, adding,
Every
decision – made in relation to the multiple patterns being built up across the
film – develops the narrative and thematic web (…) every costume decision bears
on considerations of character, situation, fashion context, colour design, and
more. Much filmmaking seems to encourage us to treat this complex tapestry of
decision making as ‘transparent’, so that we are often unaware of the craft and
artifice involved. But all this decision making is material and it has material
effects on our experience of the film (Gibbs and Pye 10).
Gibbs
and Pye suggest, also, that these costume and color decisions shouldn’t be
ignored, but rather interrogated for their meaning and contribution to the
narrative, most especially because they are seemingly innocuous.
So, if we accept this prevalence of gray
and red as significant, we then have to interrogate the symbolism behind it. Metallino’s
book about aesthetics states, “In general, the key functions performed by
colors are: (a) to communicate and/or to inform, (b) to associate and/or to
symbolize, and (c) to excite and/or to dramatize events” (Metallino 251). The use
of colors here seems to serve the first two purposes: it communicates to viewers
who is Henry’s mother, and creates an association between Henry and his mother,
as well as a disassociation between Emma and Regina. This is especially
emphasized through Henry’s clothes, which often match his mother’s in a given
scene, as well as through the contrast of red (a warm color) and gray (a cold
color) between Regina and Emma.
Stepping back a bit, I will give credit
where credit is due and confess that the idea behind this comes from a tumblr
post comparing parallels between Emma and Regina (“Swan Queen: The List”). That
post, however, merely suggests the idea. Here, I show it through the
contextualization of examples, most importantly emphasizing the meaning that
has been gleaned from this presentation. I must prove definitively that the use
of gray and red is meant to delineate motherhood and not some other
characteristic that Regina and Emma share.
Let’s
look at some examples:
Image
courtesy of: http://marynesq.tumblr.com/post/60212418968/considering-fairy-queen-as-an-actual-thing-what
The picture above depicts Regina and
Emma’s first meeting, after Henry seeks Emma out and brings her to Storybrooke.
As Emma and Henry have only just met, it is clear that Regina has parental
custody of him. She therefore wears gray, while Emma (to her left) wears red.
In the final moments of their first meeting, Regina makes a point of
communicating to Emma that she is
Henry’s mother, and not to interpret this meeting as invitation back into his
life (as Henry was given up in a closed adoption). The combination of her
verbal assertion and color symbolism cements Regina as Henry’s mother in this
scene.
Image
courtesy of: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKvl5JFR7fI
In the scene pictured above, Emma
confronts Regina about her immoral actions. During their conflict, Regina fears
that this disapproval of her choices will bar her access to Henry. She asserts
her right, saying that he’s her son. Emma counters, enraged, “No he’s not! He’s
mine!” and Regina is denied visitation privileges. With this she asserts both
her custody of Henry and her position of his mother. Therefore, the costuming
clearly delineates this, with Emma wearing gray and Regina (to her right)
wearing red.
Image courtesy of: http://once.wikia.com/wiki/File:038_Mary_Margaret_Blanchard,_Henry_Mills,_Emma_Swan.jpg
Image
courtesy of: http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/the-evil-queen-regina-mills/images/33160766/title/regina-2x2-photo
Perhaps the most compelling example
that shows that these colors indicate motherhood (and not some other shared characteristic)
is illustrated by the two pictures above. In these two pictures, Regina and
Emma wear the same gray shirt. It is, in fact, Regina’s shirt that Henry steals
out of Regina’s closet, gives to Emma to wear, and later returns to Regina.
Through the transference of this gray shirt, Henry transfers the title of
mother between Regina and Emma according to his own preference.
Image courtesy of: http://www.tv.com/shows/once-upon-a-time-2011/community/post/once-upon-a-time-quite-a-common-fairy-review-season-3-episode-3-mulora-tinker-bell-138143484014/
Finally,
the picture above depicts Regina and Emma’s joint efforts to rescue Henry from
Neverland. Although they are working together and working toward the same goal,
still, Emma wears gray and Regina wears red. This delineation is cleared up by
the dialogue and personal allegiances of the characters. When asked about the
strengths she lends to the rescue party, Emma says, “I’m a mother.” She also
describes herself as “a pissed off mother” when questioned about her identity.
Emma also enjoys the support of the majority of the rescue party; her own
mother, father, and love interest all identify her as Henry’s mother, while
Regina is the only person to consider herself Henry’s mother.
After
analyzing these examples, it seems too far-fetched to call all of these
occurrences of gray and red coincidences. Furthermore, there seems little doubt
that the use of gray and red costumes for Regina and Emma are a conscious
choice to symbolize their position as Henry’s mothers. The choice of gray and
red particularly, however, remains a mystery. As cool and warm colors,
respectively, they convey a sense of opposition. So, too, while the innocuous
gray conveys a sense of complacency and security, red conveys passion – perhaps
a passion to regain custody over a son. Now, as to the producer’s intentions
with regards to subtlety, we can only guess. However, I know one thing. I’ll
never have a headache again about who is widely regarded as Henry’s mother.
Maybe I can even make some informed predictions about storylines, now that I’ve
cracked the code.
Works Cited:
Gibbs, John, and Douglas Pye, eds. Style and Meaning:
Studies in the Detailed Analysis of Film.
Manchester: Manchester UP, 2005. Google
Books. Web. 23 Oct. 2013.
Kitsis, Edward, and Adam Horowitz. Once Upon A Time.
ABC. Los Angeles, CA, n.d.
Television.
Metallinos, Nikos. Television Aesthetics: Perceptual,
Cognitive, and Compositional Bases.
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. Google Books.
Web. 23 Oct. 2013.
Mittell, Jason. "Making Meaning." Television and
American Culture. New York, NY:
Oxford UP, 2010. 161-212. Print.
"Swan
Queen: The List." Web log post. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Oct. 2013.
<calculaic.tumblr.com/swanqueen>.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.