This past summer, Bravo aired it’s first
episode of Princesses: Long Island, a
reality show following six, late-twenty-something’s living in Long Island. The
six protagonists, Ashlee, Chanel, Erica, Casey, Joey, and Amanda, are spoiled,
Jewish, living at home with their parents, and constantly on the lookout for a
“nice Jewish boy” to marry (Shaw 2013). In the premiere
episode, Ashlee, who is arguably the most spoiled of the bunch, exclaimed, “Everybody has a stereotype of a Long Island Jewish girl...
People get so offended! I’m like, ‘Bring it.’ I’m Jewish, I’m American, and I’m
a princess” (Mitchell 2013). It became evident as the show progressed that to Ashlee’s dismay, yes,
people do get offended, as the show received much criticism for it’s negative
portrayals of Jewish Long Islanders. The women take pride in their wealthy,
spoiled lifestyles and perpetuate Jewish stereotypes through things like their
frequent outbursts of Yiddish one-liners and their references to marrying a
rich doctor or lawyer. But, even
though Bravo’s Princesses: Long Island relies on Semitic
stereotypes and self-centered characters, causing criticism and backlash
against the show, it is popular and enjoyed by many because it invites
audiences to engage in ironic viewing.
The
women of Princesses: Long Island have
no shame when it comes to their Jewish heritage. Quite the opposite, actually;
in the trailer for the show, we see the protagonists highly playing up their
Jewishness. For example, Chanel, who is modern Orthodox, arrives at Shabbat dinner and screams, “Guess what
I have… Manischewitz!!”. Another instance occurs when Ashlee claims, “My
verklemptness is making me schvitz.” The trailer ends with Erica, the “hot
girl” with a drinking problem, saying, “Shabbat Shalom. Go f**k yourself,” (Trailer). These three examples are only a
few of the outrageous Jewish exclamations the women make in the minute and a half
long trailer for the show. It is examples like these along with the general
perpetuation of the Jewish American Princess stereotype in Princesses: Long Island that caused backlash and criticism among
viewers.
In the premier episode,
Joey, the only Princess who seems to have an income of her own, explains, “the car
you drive, the bag on your arm, the guy you date is pretty much who you are in
Long Island” (Stein 2013). Joey’s comment emphasizes the narcissism and materialism
of the Princesses, which in turn reflects on the cast as both Long Islanders
and Jewish women in general. Andrew Romano of The Daily Beast said, “when the Princesses behave in ways that seem to confirm the
hoariest stereotypes of their tribe—when they are loud, or pushy, or
money-obsessed—they aren’t just reflecting poorly on wealthy women… They’re
reflecting poorly on an entire enthoreligious group—a group that was
systematically persecuted for centuries, often because of those same
stereotypes” (Romano 2013).
Another
instance of criticism came from David Israel, a New York congressman. Israel
said Princesses, "leads viewers to believe that this is what being Jewish is
all about, that if you're Jewish and live on Long Island, you're narcissistic,
you are all about money and that a Shabbat dinner is all about drinking and
fighting," (Associated Press
2013). Joey’s comment enforces
that material items define who you are in the Princess culture, which confirms
negative stereotypes viewers may have already believed.
The presentation of
Jewishness on Princesses: Long Island
enables anti-Semitic stereotypes that have been around for decades, and while
there was much criticism around the show, like Romano and Israel’s commentary,
the show was successful; it’s premiere episode racked up over 1 million viewers
(Kondolojy 2013). Hillary Busis, author of an Entertainment Weekly article about the show’s premier, says, “I want to hunt down and shake
the Princesses for baldly reinforcing horrible, outdated stereotypes about our
people… And yet. I also can’t stop watching this damn show…” (Busis 2013).
An explanation for the
show’s popularity and for the sensation described by Hillary Busis is that it
creates a space for viewers to engage in ironic viewing. Susan J. Douglas,
author of Jersey Shore: Ironic Viewing,
writes, “Irony offers us the following fantasy: the people on the screen may be
rich, or spoiled, or beautiful, or allowed to party nonstop, but you, oh
superior viewer, get to judge and mock them, and thus are above them” (150). As viewers, we enjoy the
mockery that the Princesses make of themselves and their religion because we
see ourselves as being above them, and can therefore judge them. Ironic viewing
creates an “us versus them” dichotomy, and allows us to consciously separate ourselves
from what takes place on screen.
Douglas continues, “…
Irony means that you can look like you are absolutely not seduced by the mass
media, while then being seduced by the media, while wearing a knowing smirk”
(150). Princesses creates a space for
viewers to allow ourselves to be sucked in to the show, but only to mock what
takes place on screen. Additionally, Princesses:
Long Island encourages what Douglas calls the third person effect, meaning
that as viewers, we believe we “watch the show ironically and aren’t taken in
by it while other, presumably more naïve viewers must take it utterly at face
value. Thus viewers can feel superior to the cast members but also to other
viewers imagined to be less sophisticated than they” (150). The third person
effect relates to Congressman David Israel’s concerns referenced earlier; he
claims that the stereotypical portrayals on Princesses
leads viewers to believe that that is what being Jewish is about. While I can
watch the show and know that, although they claim “it’s a Jewish thing,” Princesses: Long Island is not an
accurate depiction of Jewish culture, there are other viewers that may think
the on screen portrayal of Judaism is what all
Jews are like. However, this is exactly how ironic viewing and the third person
effect work; Princesses invites it’s
viewers to see themselves as superior to other viewers, even though all other
viewers may also be critical of the same stereotypes.
Though Bravo’s Princesses: Long Island relies on
Semitic stereotypes and narcissistic cast members, which in turn leads to high
amounts of criticism, the show is popular and enjoyable because it offers a
space for audiences to partake in ironic viewing. The six Princesses of the
show perpetuate multiple Jewish stereotypes, whether it be their
self-identification with the Jewish American Princess image or their obsession
with finding a husband. However, although audience members know the show is
enabling negative images, we still watch, and that is because the show allows
for us to engage in ironic viewing. As a viewer, we can watch Princesses and feel that we are above
the cast members, because as Douglas says, “however dumb or selfish we were
today, at least we weren’t like that”
(149). Princesses: Long Island
creates an arena where viewers can watch cast members be outlandish and promote
horribly offensive stereotypes of Jewish women, but we can watch with a knowing
superiority that we are both better than the foolish cast members and even
other viewers who may take Princesses
at face value. While it may have been offensive, Princesses: Long Island’s first season was a success because it
allowed viewers to watch ironically and feel that they were better than the
ridiculousness that took place on screen.
Works Cited
Associated Press. "Congressman: 'Princesses' Promotes
Jewish Stereotypes." USA Today. Gannett,
21 June 2013. Web. 20 Oct. 2013.<http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/tv/2013/06/21/protest-princesses-long-island/2447323/>.
Busis, Hillary. "Oy Vey, I Can't Stop Watching Bravo's
'Princesses: Long Island'" Entertainment Weekly.
N.p., 7 July 2013. Web. 20 Oct. 2013.<http://popwatch.ew.com/2013/07/07/bravo-princesses-long-island/>.
Douglas, Susan J. "Jersey Shore: Ironic Viewing." 148-55. Online.
Kondolojy, Amanda. "Sunday Cable Ratings: 'Game of
Thrones' Wins Night 'Keeping Up With the
Kardashians', 'Real Housewives of New Jersey', 'Breaking Amish', 'Mad Men'
&More."
Zap 2 It. N.p., 4 June 2013. Web. 20 Oct. 2013.<http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2013/06/04/sunday-cable-ratings-game-of-thrones-wins-night-keeping-up-with-the-kardashians-real-housewives-of-new-jersey-breaking-amish-mad-men-more/185649/>.
Mitchell, Corrie. "‘Princesses: Long Island' Embraces A
Stereotype And Leaves Some Jews Uncomfortable."
The Huffington Post. N.p., 22 June 2013. Web. 20 Oct. 2013. <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/22/princesses-long-island-stereotype-leaves- jews-uncomfortable_n_3480004.html>.
Romano, Andrew. "Is Bravo's Jewish Princesses Long
Island the Most Offensive TV Show Ever?"
The Daily Beast. Newsweek/Daily Beast, 22 July 2013. Web. 20 Oct. 2013. <http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/07/22/is-bravo-s-jewish-princesses-long-island-the-most-offensive-tv-show-ever.html>.
Shaw, Markirah. "'Princesses: Long Island' Reality Show
Receives Backlash for Stereotyping Jewish-Americans."
The Celebrity Cafe. N.p., 23 June 2013. Web. 20 Oct. 2013. <http://thecelebritycafe.com/feature/2013/06/princesses-long-island-reality-show-receives-backlash-stereotyping-jewish-americans>.
Stein, Rachel. "Princesses: Long Island: The Worst
Lines of the Premier." Television Without Pity.
N.p., 3 June 2013. Web. 20 Oct. 2013. <http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/telefile/lets-review-shall-we/2013/06/long-island-princesses-bravo-tv-episode-review/>.
“Trailer.” Princesses:
Long Island. Bravo. Television.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.