T.V. has been criticized for the gender and racial
stereotypes that it produces and reflects on for many years. It is interesting
how these gender and race stereotypes have changed in society, yet are still the
base of many television shows. In the show “The Little Couple” on TLC, I
noticed how they tried challenging some typical gender stereotypes, yet failed
and reinforced them. I know, I sound like a horrible person who ruins beautiful
things by saying that, but I’m not. I’m just trying to watch out for society. The
same happened when they introduced a new race to the family through their
adoptive child. Do shows actually reinforce gender and race stereotypes when
they try too hard to tell the public that they aren’t being racist or sexist?
In “The Little Couple”, the couple had recently
gone to China to pickup their adoptive child, who also has Dwarfism. They made
the decision to adopt after they had many failed attempts to get pregnant. The
fact that they adopted a child from China brings up an interesting concept of
race and how it may be portrayed. The show could intend to show a generous
couple making a good dead while going through a struggle, this could also be
represented as a wealthy white couple helping a foreign poor child, while they
get something out of it. This concept reminds me of “The Blind Side”, where a
poor African-American is adopted and taken out of poverty and made into a
famous football player. Many of these stories use Pathos to engage people in
the story. Yet many of the race and power stereotypes can be interpreted
differently. In the journal, "The 'Other' Laughs Back: Humor And Resistance In
Anti-Racist Comedy," Weaver talks about the issue of reverse racism in the
form of comedy. This could be relevant because it is taking something that is
supposed to make the public laugh in a positive way, but may still produce an
unknown normativity of racist thoughts.
The show “The Little Couple” seems
to be an innocent show that portrays family struggles. In the episode,
“Spending Time with Will,” the family takes Will to the grocery for the first
time. During this episode, they also tried showing how caring and concerned
Will’s parents were with him, and how they wanted to adapt him to the American
culture without giving him a culture-shock experience. When analyzing it
through a different perspective, we see that the mom emphasized many Chinese stereotypes.
She makes comments on how Will can’t only eat rice, or questions if it is
“safe” for him to eat certain foods. She looks at the Asian culture as
something exotic and completely different. She also makes a lot of weird
comments on how there are no groceries stores in China.
This episode was also mostly about the dad playing with
the boy and the mom cooking. Through out the scene, the characters stated many
times that the dad would usually be helping in the kitchen also, but that the
dad was playing with Will, so he couldn’t help. Then he also made a comment
about how the food was actually good and that his wife didn’t burn anything.
These things were said to try to cover up the fact that there were traditional
gender roles being played out. This would have been unnoticeable to a typical
viewer, but I believe that by them stating it throughout the scene it makes it
look like they are playing stereotypical gender roles and that there is a level
of sexism. The men were playing with toy cars and were wrestling on the floor,
while the woman was cooking food and making the grocery list. The wife also
stated that she would be the one taking care of signing him up for school and
all of the logistics like that. This could be another way of showing sexism
bluntly but subtlety. In “The Subtleties of Blatant Sexism,” Johnson argues that it “provides
viewers with rhetorical resources to imagine their view in practices as an act
of protest against an imagined dominant female authority, and that those
resources potentially allow viewers to accept the sexism of the program at face
value. This is a dangerous concept, like hidden racism, because viewers don’t
think about the subtle messages the show presents.
It is interesting to see how
channels like TLC try to show a diverse range of shows, yet try to adapt to a
conservative side of society. Even though shows like, “The Little Couple” try
to present themselves as modern and liberal, they still stick to many of the
stereotypical foundations. “The Little Couple” is a show that one might find
enjoyable because of how emotional it is, and how easily it is to share
feelings with the characters. What we overlook is the amount of hidden racism
and sexism that innocent shows subtlety show. This could be very dangerous
because the viewers think positively of the show and may take it as a role
model show rather than think about it critically. I believe we have to be more attentive as viewers to the subtle statements we get exposed to. Do you know of any shows that
might have hidden racism or sexism? Do you think it is inevitable to not have a bias when it comes to racism and sexism?
"Bill and Jen's Excellent
Adventure: From TLC to Oprah and Beyond: Bios: TLC." TLC. N.p.,
n.d. Web. 20 Oct. 2013.
"How We Got On TV: Little Couple:
TLC." TLC. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 Oct. 2013.
Johnson, Ann. "The Subtleties of
Blatant Sexism." Communication Critical/ Cultural Studies (2007):
n. pag. Web.
"The Little Couple Unite with
Their New Daughter." PEOPLE.com. N.p., 14 Oct. 2013. Web. 20 Oct.
2013.
"TLC's 'Little Couple' Defends
Their Double Adoption." Wetpaint. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 Oct. 2013.
Weaver, Simon. "The 'Other'
Laughs Back: Humor And Resistance In Anti-Racist Comedy." Sociology 44.1
(2010): 31-48. Communication & Mass Media Complete. Web. 17 Oct. 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.